What do we know about mollusk contamination?
Contamination via micro-organisms
Mollusks filter water to eat and are therefore susceptible to
absorbing and accumulating various types of micro-organisms which
exist in water, whether they are pathogens or not. Little data
exists about the presence of micro-organisms in mollusks harvested
for non-commercial purposes. A study in the summer of 1999 of
nine soft-shell clam harvesting areas between Grandes-Bergeronnes
and Pointe- aux-Outardes on the North Shore revealed new information
about microbial contamination and mollusks. The most notable results
indicated an increased frequency of detection of Cryptosporidium
sp. and Giardia sp. pathogens in soft shell clams as the most
frequently detected organisms, followed by Campylobacter sp. However,
high levels of contamination indicators (Escherichia coli and
fecal coliform) were only detected in a small proportion of these
contaminated samples. Other studies are necessary to validate
results obtained. Indeed these results may be explained by the
low sensitivity of the method used for counting bacteria and the
effect of water salinity on the common indicators.28


Poisoning caused by mollusk consumption29
A surveillance study of mollusk-related illnesses
was conducted in Eastern Quebec from spring 1999 to winter 2001.
A total of 48 poisoning episodes affecting 66 people were inventoried.
An exhaustive analysis of the information collected for each case
(symptoms, type of food consumed, blood and stool analyses, investigation
report, etc.) was conducted to determine whether there was a link
between the illness and mollusk consumption. Among the recorded
episodes, 3 were classified as “confirmed”, 30 “potential”,
11 “unlikely”, and 4 “rejected”. Two of
the three “confirmed” episodes were of microbial origin
and involved a bacterial pathogen (Bacillus cereus and Clostridium
perfringens). The other episode concerned
marine toxins (PSP). Close to 70% of the episodes classified as
“confirmed” or “potential” were associated
with consuming seafood from a restaurant, grocery store or fish
market. Non-commercial harvesting was responsible for six episodes
of poisoning (18%). Mussels are without a doubt the most frequent
cause of these episodes (55% of cases), followed by whelk (15%)
and soft-shelled clams (15%). In a 1997 study in the North Shore
region, close to 8% of respondents said that they had become ill
from eating mollusks.
Biotoxin contamination
Mollusks are also capable of absorbing microscopic
algae, some of which produce biotoxins, especially planktonic
algae, Alexandrium tamarense.30
These algae, found mostly in the lower estuary in summer and along
the Gulf of St. Lawrence shoreline, multiply and concentrate according
to various environmental conditions (temperature, variations in
salt content, abundance of nutrient matter, currents).31,
33
Once contaminated, mollusks can maintain their
toxicity from several weeks to several months. These toxins accumulate
in the mollusk’s internal organs and can cause various types
of poisoning in those who eat them. The three most likely to occur
in Quebec are paralytic shellfish poisoning (PSP), amnesiac shell
fish poisoning (ASP) and diarrhetic shellfish poisoning (DSP).32

Mollusks from the St. Lawrence are
filtering organisms which may contain pathogenic micro-organisms
and biotoxins.
PSP is the most frequently experienced poisoning
among those who eat mollusks from the St. Lawrence – the
region of Canada that sees the largest number of such cases. Since
1984, at least 16 confirmed cases of PSP have been recorded. The
last cases of ASP recorded in Quebec were in 1987 and were related
to consumption of mollusks from Prince Edward Island. No cases
of DSP have been reported in Quebec.32
In 1998 the unexpected discovery of new toxins in
mollusks from the Magdalen Islands, particularly those that cause
diarrhetic poisoning, alerted researchers from the Canadian Food
Inspection Agency to measure the toxin in question in the digestive
glands of mussels and other mollusks from various shellfish harvesting
areas. Approximately 10% of samples were contaminated with diarrhetic
toxins. Of these, 56% were taken from outside the Magdalen Islands,
demonstrating that the contaminant first seen in the summer of
1998 existed in other harvest regions of Quebec. The occurrence
of these toxins may have been caused by Prorocentrum lima algae,
as was the case in mussels analyzed from elsewhere in Eastern
Canada. Researchers also discovered Prorocentrum mexicanum from
the same algae family. They had been previously unaware of its
presence in the region, as it is normally found in more southern
latitudes. They noticed that under certain environmental conditions
these algae could be found in the digestive glands of cultivated
mussels.33

Chemical contamination
A health risk evaluation regarding the occurrence
of chemicals in mollusks was conducted in 1997 on the North Shore
between Tadoussac and Baie-Trinité. The majority of known
chemical contaminants were detected in the soft-shell clam samples.
Exposure to chemical contaminants when consuming soft-shell clams
was evaluated according to various consumption scenarios. The
results indicated that chemical substances capable of causing
threshold toxic effects, such as non carcinogenic systemic effects,
were not present in sufficient concentrations to create a risk
for an individual eating a normal portion of soft-shell clams,
even among regular consumers.34

Several cases of poisoning are recorded
each year among mollusk harvesters.
Some preventive measures25,
35, 36